Skip to main content

Table 4 Model-based associations of the food environment with DIS stratified by community type (n = 20,322)

From: Assessing the association between food environment and dietary inflammation by community type: a cross-sectional REGARDS study

 

Higher Density Urban

Lower Density Urban

Suburban/small town

Rural

β (SE)

p-value

β (SE)

p-value

β (SE)

p-value

β (SE)

p-value

Supermarkets

 Percentage, tailoreda

0.67 (0.54)

0.21

0.36 (0.32)

0.27

− 0.16 (0.66)

0.81

− 0.03 (0.43)

0.94

Fast-food restaurants

 Percentage, tailoreda

0.46 (0.27)

0.09

0.55 (0.18)

 < 0.01

1.50 (0.37)

 < .001

0.42 (0.23)

0.06

  1. Bold denotes statistically significant at Bonferroni-corrected α < 0.01 level. Supermarkets and fast-food restaurants were modeled together. We controlled for individual-level covariates, NSEE, and total food outlets in all models. Higher scores indicate more proinflammatory diets (theoretical range: − 14.9–12.8)
  2. aWe tailored buffer sizes to each community type using 2-, 3-, 10-, and 16 km (1-, 2-, 6-, and 10-mile) buffers for higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural areas, respectively. Buffer sizes are represented in kilometers rounded to the nearest whole number