Skip to main content

Table 5 Recovered odds ratios (true value is 1.2) by types of geocoding and number of people in a sample. Estimates and power are based on 10,000 simulated samples.

From: Geocoding accuracy and the recovery of relationships between environmental exposures and health

Number of people in sample

Geocoding Type

Estimates

Power (%)

  

Mean Odds Ratio

95%CI

 

316

Orthophoto

1.18

0.52–1.71

29.4

 

E-911

1.17

0.53–1.65

31.1

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.18

0.50–1.82

19.0

474

Orthophoto

1.19

0.75–1.56

43.4

 

E-911

1.19

0.75–1.52

41.8

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.19

0.69–1.66

24.3

632

Orthophoto

1.20

0.87–1.49

56.5

 

E-911

1.20

0.87–1.45

51.8

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.20

0.78–1.56

30.2

790

Orthophoto

1.20

0.95–1.44

66.1

 

E-911

1.20

0.94–1.42

59.4

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.20

0.86–1.51

35.5

948

Orthophoto

1.21

0.99–1.42

74.5

 

E-911

1.21

0.98–1.39

66.4

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.20

0.90–1.48

40.1

1106

Orthophoto

1.21

1.04–1.40

81.1

 

E-911

1.21

1.02–1.38

73.3

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.21

0.94–1.46

44.9

1264

Orthophoto

1.20

1.05–1.38

85.6

 

E-911

1.21

1.04–1.36

78.3

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.20

0.95–1.43

49.7

1422

Orthophoto

1.21

1.07–1.37

89.7

 

E-911

1.21

1.06–1.35

83.5

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.21

0.98–1.41

53.6

1581

Orthophoto

1.21

1.08–1.36

93.2

 

E-911

1.21

1.08–1.35

87.0

 

TIGER with 0 offset

1.21

1.00–1.40

57.0